Banning Teens From Social Media Pushes Them Into Darker Corners Online - David Inserra
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Banning Teens From Social Media Pushes Them Into Darker Corners Online - David Inserra
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
We weigh the push for an under-16 social media ban against what it would take to enforce it and what it would cost in privacy, anonymity, and open debate. We use Australia and the UK as cautionary examples and argue that empowering parents and teaching digital literacy beats outsourcing speech rules to the state.
• Australia’s ban in practice, including high rates of circumvention and account shutdowns
• unintended shift of young people towards riskier platforms and unfiltered browsing
• why age verification undermines anonymous speech and creates data breach exposure
• the case for anonymity, from historical pamphleteers to modern whistleblowers
• parental responsibility, practical tools, and education as alternatives to blanket bans
• moral panic patterns and why correlation is not causation in harms research
• how “design not content” arguments can mask censorship incentives
• why government-defined “harmful speech” becomes political and inconsistent
If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and consider sharing the podcast with others.
Support the show
https://www.fsu.nz/
https://x.com/NZFreeSpeech
https://www.instagram.com/freespeechnz/
https://www.tiktok.com/@freespeechunionnz