エピソード

  • Daniel Dennett: Why You Are Not a Biological Puppet
    2026/07/05

    Source: Elbow Room (Daniel Dennett)

    続きを読む 一部表示
    56 分
  • The Moses AI Dilemma
    2026/07/03

    An analysis of

    Building a God: The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and the Race to Control It

    Book by Christopher DiCarlo







    続きを読む 一部表示
    43 分
  • How Game Theory Created Human Morality
    43 分
  • Why AI ignores religion in a crisis
    2026/06/06

    Learn more: Religious Omission or Cultural Projection?

    A critique of

    D. Wingate et al., “Omissive Bias in Religious Representation: Benchmarking LLM Answers to Everyday Ethical Decision-Making,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.24319, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.24319.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    38 分
  • Why your AI won't mention God
    2026/06/05

    Learn more: When Representation Becomes Advocacy


    Learn more: The “Utah Standard” for a Global Tool, The Demographic Dissonance

    A critique of

    Wingate, D., Carty, S., Coates, J., Feldman, D., Fulda, N., Howell, L., Israelson, B., Jacobs, D., Karr, J., Kimes, J. P., Kincaid, E., Martens, P., Mobley, G., Pinheiro, S., Slemboski, L., & Whiting, P. (2026). Omissive bias in religious representation: Benchmarking LLM answers to everyday ethical decision-making. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.24319


    The paper argues that large language models underrepresent religion in responses to everyday ethical and existential questions. This critique questions whether such omission is evidence of bias or a consequence of a deliberate design principle: not presuming a user’s religious beliefs. It further examines the methodological assumptions underlying the benchmark and asks whether introducing religion into otherwise non-religious conversations would promote inclusivity or merely amplify the influence of dominant religious traditions in global AI systems.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    49 分
  • Should AI chatbots offer religious advice?
    2026/06/05

    Learn more: The “Utah Standard” for a Global Tool, The Demographic Dissonance

    A critique of

    Wingate, D., Carty, S., Coates, J., Feldman, D., Fulda, N., Howell, L., Israelson, B., Jacobs, D., Karr, J., Kimes, J. P., Kincaid, E., Martens, P., Mobley, G., Pinheiro, S., Slemboski, L., & Whiting, P. (2026). Omissive bias in religious representation: Benchmarking LLM answers to everyday ethical decision-making. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.24319


    The paper argues that large language models underrepresent religion in responses to everyday ethical and existential questions. This critique questions whether such omission is evidence of bias or a consequence of a deliberate design principle: not presuming a user’s religious beliefs. It further examines the methodological assumptions underlying the benchmark and asks whether introducing religion into otherwise non-religious conversations would promote inclusivity or merely amplify the influence of dominant religious traditions in global AI systems.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    56 分
  • The Vatican Battle for AI Authority
    2026/06/01


    Full interview: Atheist Mindset: In conversation with Gilles Ragnaud

    続きを読む 一部表示
    45 分
  • An interview with Gilles Ragnaud: Religious Authority Against Rational AI
    2026/05/30

    Complete: Atheist Mindset: In conversation with Gilles Ragnaud


    続きを読む 一部表示
    41 分