George Sclavos was a well-known member of his community in Leppington where her owned a pharmacy. George never married, never had children, and was 65 years old when he died suddenly of a heart attack in August 2013.

Okan Yesilhat was 30 years younger than George. It therefore garnered more than a little attention and surprise when, after George’s death, Okan claimed that for 14 years they had been having a secret same-sex relationship.

This secret relationship was the basis of Okan’s legal claims in relation to George's estate:

a. his claim for family provision from George’s extensive estate, worth $6m at his death,

b. his claim that extensive funds he had received from George were gifts and not loans,

c. his claim that the George’s informal will had been fabricated.

The big question was, did George and Okan really have a secret 14-year relationship or was the whole thing a fantasy, an elaborate story and elaborate deception intended to fleece the estate?

Citation:

• Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2015] NSWSC 1028

• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat [2017] NSWSC 666 (9 June 2017)

• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 584 (22 May 2019)

• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 1752 (13 December 2019)

• Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2021] NSWCA 110 (28 May 2021)

George Sclavos was a well-known member of his community in Leppington where her owned a pharmacy. George never married, never had children, and was 65 years old when he died suddenly of a heart attack in August 2013.

Okan Yesilhat was 30 years younger than George. It therefore garnered more than a little attention and surprise when, after George’s death, Okan claimed that for 14 years they had been having a secret same-sex relationship.

This secret relationship was the basis of Okan’s legal claims in relation to George's estate:

a. his claim for family provision from George’s extensive estate, worth $6m at his death,

b. his claim that extensive funds he had received from George were gifts and not loans,

c. his claim that the George’s informal will had been fabricated.

The big question was, did George and Okan really have a secret 14-year relationship or was the whole thing a fantasy, an elaborate story and elaborate deception intended to fleece the estate?

Citation:

• Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2015] NSWSC 1028
• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat [2017] NSWSC 666 (9 June 2017)
• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 584 (22 May 2019)
• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 1752 (13 December 2019)
• Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2021] NSWCA 110 (28 May 2021)

George Sclavos was a well-known member of his community in Leppington where her owned a pharmacy. George never married, never had children, and was 65 years old when he died suddenly of a heart attack in August 2013.

Okan Yesilhat was 30 years younger than George. It therefore garnered more than a little attention and surprise when, after George’s death, Okan claimed that for 14 years they had been having a secret same-sex relationship.

This secret relationship was the basis of Okan’s legal claims in relation to George's estate:

a. his claim for family provision from George’s extensive estate, worth $6m at his death,

b. his claim that extensive funds he had received from George were gifts and not loans,

c. his claim that the George’s informal will had been fabricated.

The big question was, did George and Okan really have a secret 14-year relationship or was the whole thing a fantasy, an elaborate story and elaborate deception intended to fleece the estate?

Citation:

• Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2015] NSWSC 1028
• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat [2017] NSWSC 666 (9 June 2017)
• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 584 (22 May 2019)
• Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 1752 (13 December 2019)
• Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2021] NSWCA 110 (28 May 2021)

CASE: Re the will of William Ian Southey [2025] VSC 801

Two months before his death, William Ian Southey made a Will leaving most of his $2.5 million estate to his partner Kyle Stuart Jackson.

The only problem was that William had never met Kyle in person. And after William's death, Kyle could not be found.

CASE: Anastasia Pates v Diane Craig and The Public Trustee Estate of the Late Joyce Jean Cole [1995] NSWSC 87

This case involves a dispute over the last will of the late Joyce Jean Cole and the accusations that Joyce did not have the capacity to make her 1993 will, that she didn’t know or approve of the contents of the will, and that it was executed under undue influence and fraud.

Joyce met Reginald Greenfield when she was in her 60s and they went on to have a relationship for about 10 years.

Unfortunately, in 1990 Reginald suffered a stroke and soon after was moved to a nursing home. After that, Joyce's neighbours and friends noticed a marked decline in Joyce's mental health.

Around Christmas 1992, Joyce met Anastasia Pates and within 3 months Joyce changed her Will to leave her entire estate to Anastasia.

Reginald's daughter litigated on his behalf, seeking to have the 1993 Will overturned in favour of Joyce's 1989 Will which had left everything to Reginald.

CASE: In the estate of Giuseppe Pellegrino (deceased) [2025] ACTSC 421

So many questions in this case.

Can you disclaim an inheritance left to you in a Will? Yes.

Does the disclaimer have to be in writing? No.

If you refuse to respond to letters and email, and send back the inheritance cheque, does that constitute disclaiming your inheritance? In this case, yes.

If a person disclaims their inheritance, who does their share of the estate go to? ... that's a little tricky. Listen to the episode to find out.

CASE: Radecki & Fairbairn [2020] FamCAFC 307; Fairbairn & Radecki [2020] FCCA 1556

Fairbairn and Radecki started a relationship when both were in their 50s, had already acquired their own assets, and had their own children. A core element of their relationship was their agreement to always keep their finances separate.

However, when Fairbairn lost capacity and moved into a nursing home, Radecki refused to move out of her house. The house was Fairbairn's only assets and only if it was sold would she be able to pay the aged care accommodation bond.

Radecki, on the other hand, owned three properties in his own right. Yet despite that, he continued to live rent free in Fairbairn's house while what little savings she had were eaten away by aged care fees.

The NSW Trustee & Guardian, acting as Fairbairn's financial manager, started family law proceedings claiming that the relationship with Fairbairn and Radecki had ended.

But had it???

CASE: Wertheim v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited [2021] NSWSC 1229Relationship come in all forms. The nuclear family dynamic is declining in prevalence.

One form that is becoming increasingly common is the blended family, where you have spouses who have no children together, but have children from a previous relationship.

Later-life de facto relationships come with different concerns. For example, both parties will usually be older and will have accrued their own savings, superannuation, assets and property by the time their current relationship started. They may agree that they will continue to be financial independent, that throughout their relationship they won't intermingle their funds, they will each pay their own way, and, on their death, their estate will go to their respective children or their biological family.

This is a sensible and reasonable decision to make. But after death, can the surviving de facto go against that agreement to make a claim on the estate?