エピソード

  • Episode 24: Approved Harm: Environmental Justice, Mapping Risk, and the Cost of “Neutral” Policy
    2026/04/06

    Send us Fan Mail

    In a flat city, a hill appeared - and it wasn’t natural.

    What followed wasn’t a cover‑up or a villain - just quiet permission, baked into a system that didn’t need to lie to do damage.

    In this episode of Justice Seekers, we break down the legal fight that exposed how environmental harm gets assigned - and why proving unfairness isn’t the same as proving intent.

    The landfill stayed.
    The pattern didn’t.
    And once mapped, it changed everything.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • Episode 23: The Radium Girls: The Case That Exposed Corporate Lies and Changed Workplace Law
    2026/03/30

    Send us Fan Mail

    In the early 1900s, young women working in American factories were told a glowing substance called radium was safe and even beneficial. It lit up watch dials, boosted industrial progress, and symbolized the future.

    But behind that glow was a deadly truth.

    In this episode of Justice Seekers, we uncover the story of the Radium Girls: factory workers who unknowingly ingested radioactive paint while doing their jobs. As their bodies began to fail, corporations like the United States Radium Corporation denied responsibility, blamed the victims, and concealed the science.

    Their fight for justice would spark one of the first major toxic exposure cases in U.S. history—reshaping labor law, corporate accountability, and workplace safety.

    This is the story of corporate deception, scientific discovery, and the women who forced America to confront the cost of progress.


    Mixed & Edited by Next Day Podcast

    info@nextdaypodcast.com

    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • Episode 22 When Parents Are Prosecuted: The New Legal Theory of Criminal Liability
    2026/03/23

    Send us Fan Mail

    What happens when prosecutors charge parents for their child’s school shooting?

    In this episode of Justice Seekers, we break down the landmark Crumbley case, a recent Georgia murder conviction, and emerging cases where parents are charged before an attack occurs.

    We explore criminal negligence, parental liability, gun access, warning signs, and how prosecutors are redefining responsibility in mass shooting cases.

    Can failing to act become a crime? And where does the law draw the line?

    Mixed & Edited by Next Day Podcast

    info@nextdaypodcast.com

    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • Episode 21: A Drop of Trust: The Legal Case Behind Theranos.
    2026/03/16

    Send a text

    Theranos promised a revolution in blood testing: hundreds of lab results from a single drop of blood.

    The idea made Elizabeth Holmes one of Silicon Valley’s most celebrated founders and brought Theranos machines into Walgreens pharmacies across the country.

    But behind the promise, the technology wasn’t working.

    In this episode of Justice Seekers, Natalie and Katrina break down the Theranos scandal through the lens of criminal fraud law. Why did so many sophisticated investors believe? What happens legally when a company claims a product works when it doesn’t? And why did prosecutors focus on investor fraud instead of patient harm?

    Because fraud cases rarely look dramatic in real time. They look like emails, meetings, pitch decks—and small decisions that slowly compound.

    By the time the law steps in, the trust has already been broken.


    Mixed & Edited by Next Day Podcast

    info@nextdaypodcast.com

    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • Episode 20: The Supreme Court and True Crime: Landmark Criminal Procedure Cases That Shape Your Encounters
    2026/03/09

    Send a text

    In this episode of Justice Seekers, attorneys Natalie Stubbs and Katrina break down the constitutional rules behind some of the most important criminal procedure cases in American history. These decisions define what police can do, what your rights are, and what happens when the government crosses the line.

    But this isn’t a law school lecture.

    It’s a plain-language guide to the constitutional guardrails that apply when real people encounter law enforcement—from interrogations and searches to roadside traffic stops.

    If you’ve ever wondered:

    • When do police have to read Miranda rights?
    • What does “I want a lawyer” actually do legally?
    • Can officers search your car without a warrant?
    • What is reasonable suspicion vs. probable cause?
    • How long can a traffic stop legally last?

    This episode walks you through the landmark cases that answer those questions.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
  • Episode 19: Sandra Birchmore Part 2
    2026/03/02

    Send a text

    In this episode of Justice Seekers, attorneys Natalie and Katrina break down how civil litigation, independent forensic review, and federal civil rights law reopened an investigation many believed was finished and how procedural law ultimately reshaped the path toward accountability.

    We explore the legal mechanisms that allowed Sandra’s case to move forward, including wrongful death litigation, internal police investigations, federal jurisdiction, grand jury indictments, and the complex pretrial motions now shaping the upcoming federal trial.

    This episode focuses on the law behind the headlines, and the difficult question at the center of the case:

    What happens when the justice system must reexamine its own conclusions?

    続きを読む 一部表示
    33 分
  • Episode 18: Sandra Birchmore, Part 1
    2026/02/23

    Send a text

    When 23-year-old Sandra Birchmore was found dead in her Massachusetts apartment, authorities quickly ruled her death a suicide.

    But Sandra was pregnant, making future plans, and deeply connected to several police officers she had known since joining a youth law-enforcement program as a teenager.

    In this first episode of Justice Seekers, two attorneys examine how a case can be shaped — and sometimes limited — by early investigative assumptions. As troubling allegations of grooming and misconduct emerge, a critical timeline begins to challenge the official narrative.

    What happens when a case is closed before all the questions are asked?

    This is where Sandra’s story begins.

    Part One of a two-part series.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • Episode 17: Blood Will Tell: The Wrongful Conviction of Joe Bryan
    2026/02/16

    Send a text

    A small Texas town. A brutal murder. A husband with a solid alibi, and a conviction built on blood evidence that modern science now calls unreliable.

    In 1985, schoolteacher Mickey Bryan was found murdered in her home. Prosecutors claimed bloodstain analysis proved her husband, Joe Bryan, was the killer — despite being over 100 miles away at the time.

    What followed was a decades-long fight exposing junk forensic science, overlooked suspects, and a justice system determined to defend its own theory.

    In this episode of Justice Seekers, we uncover how one piece of questionable evidence helped send an innocent man to prison for more than 30 years and why his conviction but not his imprisonment still stands today.

    Because sometimes the most dangerous evidence… looks like science.

    🎙️ Follow Justice Seekers for true stories of wrongful convictions and the fight for justice.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    29 分