『Let's talk Transformation : The business leaders podcast』のカバーアート

Let's talk Transformation : The business leaders podcast

Let's talk Transformation : The business leaders podcast

著者: Suzie Lewis
無料で聴く

今ならプレミアムプランが3カ月 月額99円

2026年5月12日まで。4か月目以降は月額1,500円で自動更新します。

概要

"Let's talk Transformation" is a podcast for busy yet curious people who want to stay connected. Bite sized chunks of thoughts and ideas on transformation and change to inspire and inform you - be it about digital, culture, innovation, change or leadership... ! Connect with us to listen to dynamic and curious conversations about transformation.Copyright 2026 Suzie Lewis マネジメント マネジメント・リーダーシップ リーダーシップ 経済学
エピソード
  • #167 Innovation and agility in the AI era with JL Heather
    2026/04/20
    "If you truly want a competitive advantage, you have to start looking at the human systems involved, and make sure you understand your customer”Remember when agile and lean felt like the magic bullet for every organizational issue? We embraced them, hoping to cut waste and move faster. For a while, they really did change things, but the frameworks became the main point, and many companies ended up with sticky notes and stand-ups that went nowhere. It’s a story I’ve seen play out too many times.What happens when the tools designed for change become barriers themselves?This question becomes even more pressing with the rise of generative AI. Is this the long-awaited solution that will truly change everything? Is it the “magic wand” for better work? We discuss the reframe of agile and lean in an AI-driven world, where AI can generate, decide, and act. We also discussed what this means for humans who still need to connect, lead, and make sense of it all.The reluctance to change often stems from what JL calls a “can’t culture.” This culture takes various forms : Political “can’t”: Resistance due to perceived loss of power or control.Financial “can’t”: Claims of insufficient funds, though some of these are not genuine constraints.Strategic and capability “can’t”: Limitations in strategy or skill sets.Structural “can’t”: Incentive structures that conflict with agile organizational goals.When these factors converge, the transformation process can widen the divide between those performing the work and those leading the organization, creating a dangerous situation. Agentic-human collaboration can enable a team/organisation to use AI to enhance their work and analyse outcomes to look for optimisation, e.g. to help solve customers’ problems and create more customer value, but we also need to address the culture and the mindset of the leaders and teams. Many organizations are “shoehorning AI into… structural support, capability enhancement, or supporting some sort of political structure… they’re bringing AI in to do the things they’re already doing faster.” But doing the wrong things faster doesn’t lead to better outcomes.It is dangerous to over-rely on AI, particularly during the innovation process, as it is derivative – not innovative - and human ideation can’t be automated, therefore it can be counterproductive.What metrics are you using to ensure your AI initiatives are driving actual outcomes, not just motion?The main insights you'll get from this episode are : A ‘can’t’ culture prevails when it comes to making difficult decisions, e.g. transformation; most leaders know why change is needed but struggle to implement it as they confuse motion with outcomes.Cultural, political, financial, strategic, capability, and structural ‘can’t’s are not necessarily the real constraints – it is about examining principles and values and asking the right questions at the right time to create change. AI acts as an accelerant, whatever the starting position is – it is an excellent tool for generating ideas and self- and organisational analysis but requires the human in the middle.Being ‘AI-ready’ is less accurate than having a team that is ready to use AI – it is more productive to be problem- rather than solution-focused, using AI as a thought partner at the innovation stage. Agentic-human collaboration enables a team/organisation to use AI to enhance their work and analyse outcomes to look for optimisation, e.g. to help solve customers’ problems and create more customer value.It is dangerous to over-rely on AI, particularly during the innovation process, as it is derivative – not innovative - and human ideation can’t be automated, therefore it can be counterproductive.The Breakthrough Lab Method helps clients identify ‘how might we’ statements, implement cross-functional teams and design sprints (using AI as a thought partner), and look at customer problems from a human-centered perspective.AI does not come up with the solution but helps us understand the problem better so we can iterate further; it does not change human interaction or human problems but rather exacerbates the pain of these problems. AI is making it harder to step back and solve human problems, accelerating failure without changing things for the better; we need to solve our own problems first before we can solve customers’ problems.Real competitive advantage requires an understanding of the human systems, the customer, and the problem you’re trying to solve – as AI won’t give us anything new, requiring companies to innovate and change to survive.Find out more about JL and his work here : https://centered.work/https://www.linkedin.com/in/jlheather/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    41 分
  • #166 Leadership identity & regulating burnout with Dr Melanie Gray
    2026/04/13

    "Burnout is a choice"

    This bold statement by Melanie challenged my perspective. We often see burnout as an inevitable outcome of ambition, and performance.

    Melanie and I unpack why so many leaders are experiencing burnout, not just as “overwork,” but as nervous system overload. We explore the invisible rules about success and how they impact leadership. Are you silently running on empty, normalizing exhaustion as excellence? Many high-achieving professionals find themselves in this cycle.

    We discuss practical strategies for regulating your nervous system, reframing your identity beyond performance, and designing organisational cultures that prioritize emotional repair. Burnout is a consequence of our choices, boundaries, and how we define personal value and identity. We explore how societal conditioning, amplified by the internet, drives us to benchmark ourselves against unrealistic standards, leading to constant striving as opposed to thriving.

    This relentless “always on” mentality prevents our nervous systems from resting, pushing us past our natural limits. It’s a critical lesson for all leaders: valuing self-care is not a weakness; it’s a strategic necessity for sustained effectiveness.

    The conversation then shifts to how organisations can design cultures that reward emotional repair and psychological safety. We discuss simple yet impactful changes, such as scheduling dedicated lunch breaks, ending meetings early on Fridays, creating hydration stations, and modelling boundaries by not emailing leadership after hours. The core idea is to value human beings beyond their roles and metrics.

    People do not operate well under fear or exhaustion, as these states hinder effective thinking and decision-making. Leaders should be taught emotional regulation as part of leadership development, to highlight that sensitivity is a strength, not a weakness. Now more than ever, we must challenge the myths that strong leaders are constantly busy or never vulnerable, particularly as AI takes over more task-oriented work.

    This involves fostering adaptability, having a “plan B” for careers, and detaching self-identity from job roles to maintain well-being and thrive amidst continuous organizational shifts.

    What cultural shifts do you believe are most critical for preventing chronic stress in leadership today?

    The main insights you"ll get from this episode are :

    Society has normalised exhaustion as excellence, and this is exacerbated in

    the Internet age by more striving to ‘have it all’, which causes stress and leads

    to nervous system overload/burnout.

    - The para-/sympathetic nervous system is designed for the body to rest but

    ‘always on’ is glorified and busyness does not equal productivity; we over-

    define ourselves as individuals through work, and this identity can be taken

    away.

    - Leaders must pause, stop, reflect, and seek help if necessary – (high-

    functioning) burnout can be avoided by ring-fencing self-time and resetting:

     Scan (your body)

     Tell (yourself the truth)

     Own (your decisions)

     Prioritise (yourself)

     Intentional (actions)

     Transform (willing to change)

    - Cultures that reward emotional repair can start with small steps such as no

    meetings on Fridays and modelling boundaries; removing fear and exhaustion

    enhances productivity.

    - Pre-AI experience is valuable for the new AI era to bring humanity to the data

    point, help us thrive and remain viable; this involves anticipating change and

    reskilling, using transferable skills from jobs and life experiences.

    - Human aspects such as vulnerability and remaining flexible and joyful should

    be part of leadership development; we need emotional regulation for

    individuals, teams, and the overarching system to keep us all healthy.

    Find out more about Melanie and her work here :

    https://drmelaniegraycoaching.com/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    34 分
  • #165 Mastering innovation with Bruno Pesec
    2026/04/06

    " Innovation is not just technology, systems and strategy, it is also about energy and embodied behaviour."

    Bruno and I discuss the human side of innovation and the strategic role of AI. We explore how leaders can foster creativity and manage uncertainty by adopting principles from martial arts and leveraging AI for better decision-making.

    Bruno brings a unique perspective, combining engineering rigour, martial arts mastery, and deep reflection on embodied leadership. We explore different perspectives on how to master generative conflict for Innovation success and making strategy an embodied practice. The insight on the intersection between martial arts mastery, strategy and leadership brings a new lens that every CEO should learn: how to engage in “generative conflict.” So how to 'use' fear and agression in a smarter, more constructive way, which is consensual, respectful, collaborative and vulnerable.

    Bruno sees innovation not just as systems and strategy, but as energy and embodied behaviour. The difference between doing and managing innovation is really key. Doing is about turning ideas into value; managing is scaling that process across hundreds of ideas, accepting uncertainty and potential failure. This distinction really hit home because if something is truly innovative, it comes with a big element of uncertainty. And that means failure is always a possibility, even if you do everything right.

    The main insights you'll get from this episode are :

    • Finding innovative solutions for leaders that address the human side of innovation and AI’s strategic role beyond the hype; innovation is energy and embodies behaviour, away from processes and tools.
    • The difference between ‘doing’ and ‘managing’ innovation is important: the former is about transforming ideas into money (in a corporate context); the latter is doing it at scale, i.e. concurrently developing hundreds of ideas.
    • Creativity brings something to life and is an inherent part of human nature - innovation is very personal, from which we can harness failure and maximise learning to create something of value.
    • Whilst uncertainty and ambiguity always exist, senior leaders can remove ambiguity in the form of strategy, as an unknown or unclear strategy spreads uncertainty. Strategy is like embodied practice – need to feel it in the real world.
    • Martial arts redirect fear and aggression rather than eliminate them, providing a good lesson for CEOs in how to engage in generative conflict, which is consensual, respectful, collaborative and vulnerable.
    • Strategising and innovating demand conflict, and innovation can be seen as the equivalent of sparring practice: articulating and creating something that then becomes the discussion point.
    • Playing Lean is a (serious) board game for innovation, providing a safe space between the classroom and the front line, but the emotions and experiences are real – real skill transference and a team activity.
    • Augmented strategy using AI is currently very superficial applications of LLMs, which are worthless in the bigger picture – we must optimise decision-making processes and understand decisions as humans.
    • We must first map out the requisite data, insights, and knowledge, and then leverage specific AI to create multiple scenarios; hybrid intelligence uses AI to enhance human creativity.
    • Asking customers (in a B2B environment) for feedback is invaluable for innovation – it is of great importance to have people with (life) experience who will understand the issue, and AI cannot replace this.
    • The simplest practice leaders can implement immediately is to listen and play back what they heard to check correct understanding, thereby inviting others to bring forward their thinking.

    Find out more about Bruno and his work here :

    https://www.pesec.no/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    51 分
まだレビューはありません