You're spending your voir dire on the wrong thing.

And it's not subtle.

You're trying to get ahead of the defense's argument—funneling defense points, repeating their story, mapping out everything wrong with what they might bring up.

Meanwhile, your jury is soaking up defense point after defense point.

That's the problem.

Because what you give airtime to, they give weight to.

In this week's podcast, I break down the 4 topics you should avoid in voir dire, because they quietly hand power to the other side (even when you think you're doing it right).

Love,
Sari

P.S. If you want to go deeper on this, join me LIVE on May 28th for my Beyond the Book Webinar. I'll walk you through the H2H Method™ and how it actually works in real cases and you can even bring your own case for live feedback.
Register NOW → sariswears.com/webinar

You might be asking the wrong questions.

Not bad ones.

Just ones that never get past small talk.

And if that's happening in your voir dire… you're missing the moment where jurors actually connect.

Because connection doesn't come from:

"Where are you from?"

"What do you do?"

"Have you ever…?"

It comes from something deeper.

From getting jurors to talk about what they value and actually staying there long enough for it to mean something.

Most attorneys don't do this.

Not because they don't care… but because they've never been shown how.

And that gap? It shows up later in your damages.

Coach K and I break all of this down in this week's podcast:

• What a resonant conversation actually is

• Why it changes the way jurors see your case

• And how to start shifting your questions (without it feeling forced or awkward)

If your jury feels a little disconnected… this is likely why.

Love,
Sari

Download FREE Worksheet

Quote:

"What we're really wanting from our jurors is to invest in the process. And the best time to do that is in voir dire — when they can talk about themselves and what they value… because at its core, what our plaintiff attorneys are fighting for are human values, things that we all care about. And that's what was taken in every single case."

Sari de la Motte

Can't get enough of me? Connect with me here:

Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/saridelamotte/

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/SariSwears

Watch on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/@SariDLM

Free FB Group for Plaintiff & Criminal Defense Attorneys
https://www.facebook.com/groups/fromhostagetohero/

I'm seeing this a lot lately, so let me say it straight: If your case feels too simple, you're probably FINALLY getting it right.

You keep trying to add more: more detail, more explanation, more persuasion.

But jurors don't need more.

They need clarity.

When you hit the point where someone hears your case and thinks, "Well… duh," that's the sweet spot.

Because "duh" means:

• It's common sense
• It's easy to understand
• It's hard to argue with

And most importantly, it triggers the question you want: "If it's so obvious… why didn't they do it?"

That's where your power is.

Not in being clever.

Not in making it complex.

In making it undeniable.

So if part of you is thinking, "This feels too basic…"

Good. Lean in.

Love,
Sari

Quote:

"If your case makes someone think, 'Well, duh,' that's when you know you've got it right. It means it's clear, it's common sense, and it's something no one can argue with. That's where your power is — not in being clever, but in being undeniable."

Sari de la Motte

Can't get enough of me? Connect with me here:

Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/saridelamotte/

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/SariSwears

Watch on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/@SariDLM

Free FB Group for Plaintiff & Criminal Defense Attorneys
https://www.facebook.com/groups/fromhostagetohero/