『The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson』のカバーアート

The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson

The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson

著者： Brent Johnson
無料で聴く

Show Segments Rants and Raves This is an opportunity for our audience to address issues they feel so strongly about that they want to RANTS and RAVE about the issue. Listeners will be given the chance to call in to the show and share their outrage or approval concerning their selected topic. Contact the Global Freedom Report producer or call 888-385-3733 to schedule your RANT or RAVE. Man/Woman in the Street interviews This is an opportunity for members of our audience to become freelance reporters, traveling in public areas and asking people about current events and topical issues. The reporters conducting these interviews will need to have their own equipment for recording there interactions with people. Their interviews will then be submitted to The Global Freedom Report for editing before being aired on the show. Freedom Follies This will be an occasional segment on The Global Freedom Report that features live on-air interviews with both performing artists and fine artists whose work is focused on freedom, self-determination, individual rights, and the principles of Americanism that are the theme of this show. Point/Counterpoint This segment invites members of The Global Freedom Report audience to participate in an on-air debate on noteworthy topics. In most cases, the host will take the POINT and the listener will take the COUNTERPOINT. The host will have two minutes to make his POINT; the audience member will have 2 minutes to make his or her COUNTERPOINT; the host will then have 1 minute to do a follow-up rebuttal; the audience member will then have 1 minute to do a follow-up rebuttal; finally, each party will have 1 minutes to offer a conclusion to the issue being raised. Audience members who wish to participate in POINT/COUNTERPOINT will need to email the show producer or call 888-385-3733 to schedule them on an upcoming show.Copyright 2026 Brent Johnson 政治・政府 政治学
エピソード
  • The Global Freedom Report, June 21, 2026

    The Global Freedom Report, June 21, 2026
    2026/06/22
    The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson Declaration, Defiance, and the Question of What Freedom Requires A Father’s Day Forum on Truth, Justice, and Liberty In this Father’s Day edition of The Global Freedom Report, host Brent Johnson presents the program as a listener-driven forum about truth, justice, liberty, and resistance to government overreach. Skipping over the many ad breaks, the episode’s main content includes open-line discussion, Brent’s invitation for listeners to share stories of justice or injustice, a full reading of the Declaration of Independence, a segment of A Look at the Declaration, a Lessons in Liberty teaching on the legal meaning of “include,” and several caller exchanges about rights, government power, election integrity, and constitutional questions. Belfast, Migration, and the Question of Public Resistance Brent begins the current-events portion by discussing unrest in Belfast, Northern Ireland, following reports of a violent attack allegedly involving a migrant. He frames the unrest as part of a larger reaction against mass migration policies, arguing that local populations across Europe and the United States have been ignored by political leaders and globalist institutions. He references statements from Northern Ireland’s First Minister Michelle O’Neill, activist Tommy Robinson, and critics of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, then asks listeners a central question: when people believe their government refuses to protect them, at what point do they have the right to rise up? Reading the Declaration of Independence as America’s Founding Document A major portion of the episode is devoted to the Declaration of Independence, which Brent calls the true foundational document of the United States, even more fundamental than the Constitution. He reads the Declaration at length, including its statement that rights come from the Creator, its charges against King George III, and its justification for dissolving political ties when government becomes destructive to liberty. Afterward, Brent reflects on the personal cost paid by the signers and argues that the principle of God-given, unalienable rights remains the basis for American freedom. Unalienable Rights and Refusing to Comply Brent then expands on the difference between “unalienable” and “inalienable,” saying the Declaration uses “unalienable” because rights given by God cannot be changed or taken away by any government. He argues that governments cannot truly remove rights; they can only violate them. This leads into one of the episode’s recurring themes: each person must decide what they are willing to do when government violates God-given rights. Brent illustrates this with his own story of refusing the COVID-19 injection while in Tonga, saying he would not recognize the king’s authority over his conscience or body. A Look at the Declaration - Immigration, Courts, and Judicial Dependence In the A Look at the Declaration segment, Brent focuses on parts of the Declaration accusing the British king of obstructing immigration, blocking the administration of justice, and making judges dependent on the crown. He compares those grievances to modern conditions, arguing that current Americans also face government systems that obstruct justice and place too much power in federal judicial appointments. He says the founders objected not merely to taxation, but to a broader pattern of government abuse, centralized authority, and denial of legal remedy. Listener Stories, Election Integrity, and “Lessons in Liberty” The listener-call portions center on justice, injustice, and government accountability. Caller Eric from Los Angeles shares a story about his stolen van, saying police recovered it and identified the suspect, but the justice system failed to deliver accountability under then–District Attorney George Gascón. Brent also discusses a California petition-circulator case involving payments to homeless people for voter-registration-related signatures, presenting it as part of a larger concern about election integrity. In Lessons in Liberty, Brent teaches that the legal word “include” is restrictive unless a statute says “including but not limited to,” using that point to argue that certain federal definitions do not automatically include the 50 states. Callers, Constitutional Questions, and the Closing Challenge Near the end, caller Bill from Glendale, a veteran, discusses gun rights, the Constitution, the 17th Amendment, and the broader question of how Americans can reverse the loss of freedom. Brent responds that the issue deserves a longer conversation and says he hopes to continue discussing practical solutions in the next episode. He closes by asking listeners what they are willing, and not willing, to do to protect liberty. The episode ends with Brent urging people to tell the truth, keep their word, honor their agreements, correct any trespass against others, and remember that ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 55 分
  • The Global Freedom Report, June 14, 2026

    The Global Freedom Report, June 14, 2026
    2026/06/15
    The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson The Federal Reserve, Red Pill Resistance, and the Battle Over Liberty, Money, and Control Guest G. Edward Griffin A Freedom-Focused Broadcast In this episode of The Global Freedom Report, host Brent Johnson presents a wide-ranging liberty-themed program featuring G. Edward Griffin as the central guest. The episode content centers on Brent’s commentary, his recurring listener question about government lists, his warning about artificial intelligence and school surveillance, the extended interview with Griffin about the Federal Reserve, and later segments on individual rights, property, government power, and propaganda. The transcript also reflects the user’s note that Brent’s audio echo created some garbled or repetitive wording, so the clearest content comes from the structured interview and repeated show themes. Government Lists, Rants and Raves, and Audience Participation Brent opens the main content by inviting listeners to participate in the show’s “Rants and Raves” segment, where callers can speak about issues that matter to them. He also introduces the episode’s question of the week: whether listeners are concerned about appearing on government lists, and if so, which lists concern them. This question frames the episode’s larger concern with surveillance, government tracking, privacy, and the fear that ordinary citizens may be cataloged or targeted by bureaucratic systems. AI in the Classroom and a Warning About Children’s Privacy Brent discusses a report involving parents in Washington state objecting to an artificial-intelligence experiment connected to preschool classrooms. He says the proposed program involved teachers wearing cameras to capture classroom activity and use that footage to train AI models. Brent presents this as a serious privacy issue, warning that children’s speech, expressions, behavior, and reactions could be turned into data for predictive systems. His commentary becomes intense and confrontational, but the core point is his concern that artificial intelligence could be used in schools without adequate parental knowledge or protection. G. Edward Griffin Joins to Discuss the Federal Reserve The featured interview begins with technical difficulties, including Griffin sounding distorted at first and then being brought back by phone. Brent introduces G. Edward Griffin as a writer, documentary filmmaker, and author of The Creature from Jekyll Island. The main topic is the Federal Reserve. Brent asks how the Federal Reserve Act could have passed if a private central bank was contrary to constitutional principles. Griffin responds that while the Christmas-holiday passage story may be historically true, he believes the deeper issue is that bankers had already persuaded, influenced, or controlled enough members of Congress for the legislation to pass regardless. The Banking Cartel and Congressional Dependence Griffin argues that Congress has not abolished the Federal Reserve because elected officials are financially and politically dependent on the banking system and its surrounding institutions. In his view, Congress, media, corporations, and political actors are tied to a broader banking cartel. He says that many politicians either do not understand the system or are dependent on it for campaign support, influence, and career protection. Brent and Griffin frame the Federal Reserve not simply as a monetary institution, but as a central mechanism of control over American life. Gold, Silver, Fiat Money, and Constitutional Questions Brent asks why Federal Reserve notes have not been ruled invalid if the Constitution identifies gold and silver as lawful money. Griffin replies that the same forces that allowed the Federal Reserve to exist continue to protect it. He broadens the discussion into a claim that the United States and other nations are influenced by a global cabal or cartel that extends beyond banking into education, media, churches, and government. Griffin says modern citizens are often kept afraid through wars, crises, epidemics, and economic instability, leading them to seek more government control rather than less. Violence, Strategy, and the Need to Retake Institutions A key part of the interview involves disagreement over tactics. Brent suggests that government systems may be so corrupt that ordinary legal or judicial solutions may not work. Griffin pushes back against the idea that violent resistance is the answer, arguing that modern governments possess overwhelming technological and military power. Instead, Griffin says people must retake the systems that were captured through propaganda, political organization, and institutional infiltration. He argues that citizens must become active in political parties, schools, local offices, media, and community institutions rather than merely complain or prepare defensively. Collectivism, Individualism, and the Ideological Battle Griffin identifies the deeper ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 51 分
  • The Global Freedom Report, June 7, 2026

    The Global Freedom Report, June 7, 2026
    2026/06/08
    The Global Freedom Report with Brent Johnson Accountability Against the Administrative State: Brent Johnson with Guests, Ann Vandersteel and Chris Burns on DOJA, CPS, and Parental Rights Brent Johnson Opens The Global Freedom Report In this episode of The Global Freedom Report, host Brent Johnson opens with his usual focus on liberty, government power, and the question of whether a functional free society can exist in today’s globalist world. Before bringing on his guests, Brent comments on California politics, election laws, ballot harvesting, Los Angeles mayoral politics, and the state’s broader government problems. He then turns the program toward the main subject: the work of the Department of Government Accountability, or DOJA, and its efforts to expose corruption inside government agencies. Ann Vandersteel and Chris Burns Join the Program Brent welcomes Ann Vandersteel and Chris Burns of the Department of Government Accountability. Ann is introduced as an investigative journalist, constitutional advocate, public speaker, and author of The CPS Pipeline: State-Sanctioned Kidnapping. Chris is introduced as an attorney with more than 20 years of experience in family law, criminal defense, personal injury, estate planning, and corporate law. Brent frames both guests as people working to expose government overreach and restore accountability where agencies have abused families, parents, and citizens. DOJA’s Mission and the Fight Against Agency Power Ann explains that DOJA is a citizen-led accountability initiative connected with American Made Action and American Made Foundation. Its mission is to document misconduct, support whistleblowers, organize legal action, use media exposure, and apply public pressure against officials who violate constitutional rights. She says the work has been difficult because agency government is deeply entrenched, often behaves as if it does not answer to the people, and protects itself through bureaucracy, funding structures, and institutional inertia. Child Protective Services and Title IV-E Funding A major focus of the episode is Child Protective Services and the federal funding incentives that Ann and Chris say encourage family separation. Ann argues that many children are removed without meeting the proper legal threshold and that Title IV-E and related funding streams reward foster placement more than family reunification. She says DOJA’s strategy is to reduce wrongful intake by raising the legal threshold for removal, thereby cutting off the financial incentive for agencies to take children unnecessarily. Proposed Legislation to Strengthen Due Process Ann describes proposed legislation designed to restore stronger due-process protections for parents in child welfare cases. The bill would limit removals to cases involving serious imminent risk, require rapid judicial review, require stronger evidence before removal or continued separation, and force courts to consider less restrictive alternatives such as in-home safety plans, family support, or kinship placement before foster care. She also says the proposed legislation would create a right to a six-person unanimous jury trial in dependency and termination-of-parental-rights cases. Chris Burns on the Legal Reality for Parents Chris explains how child protective cases often work in practice. He says the state may accuse a parent of abuse or neglect, initiate court proceedings, and place the parent into a process where the burden of proof can be surprisingly low despite parental rights being fundamental rights. He describes the system as difficult to challenge because parents often want the fastest path to getting their children back, while systemic appeals and constitutional challenges can take longer than the case timeline itself. Chris says this makes it hard to find cases that can fully challenge the structure of the system. Administrative Courts, Judicial Rights, and Systemic Corruption Brent and the guests discuss the difference between ordinary judicial protections and administrative proceedings. Brent argues that administrative courts can short-circuit constitutional protections, while Chris and Ann describe agency power as one of the major barriers to justice. They also discuss the Loper Bright decision and the broader question of whether agencies should be allowed to interpret, enforce, and effectively adjudicate rules that affect people’s rights. The episode repeatedly returns to the idea that government agencies must be forced back under constitutional limits. Chris Burns’ Own Legal Pressure and Burnout in Family Law The conversation also touches on Chris Burns’ personal experience as an attorney working against child welfare abuses. Chris says attorneys who handle abuse, neglect, and family-law cases often burn out quickly because the cases are emotionally heavy, poorly paid when court-appointed, and difficult to win against the state. He also discusses professional pressure placed on him, ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 54 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません