エピソード

  • Impact of Truth - Ep 26-134
    2026/04/03

    Don’t let the Left fool you into thinking otherwise.


    I spoke of the false gods many Americans, yes even conservatives worshipped. How their true nature is being revealed one by one.

    We should be happy when the truth surfaces. It can affect us all.

    But what you won’t get from true conservatives is a mixtape of contradictions. I pride myself on my consistency, as you should yours.


    President Trump says he thinks things will end in Iran in about 3 weeks. I guess by the end of April, so perhaps he’s ahead of my schedule.

    [X] SB – SoS Rubio to Stephanopoulos

    Specific objectives.

    Destruction of AF, navy, missile launching capabilities, destruction of factories.


    Strait of Hormuz…


    California canceled a gubernatorial debate because they didn’t have a single minority candidate.

    Now for Conservatives, that wouldn’t matter. But Democrats knew this would not look good for their state.


    California built a political brand on diversity so vivid it practically glows in the dark. Yet when the curtain rises on the governor’s race, the casting call looks… oddly monochrome. Somewhere between the slogans and the spreadsheets, reality decided to RSVP “no.”


    California, that shimmering laboratory of progressive ambition, has spent decades marketing itself as the place where diversity is not merely welcomed but curated, polished, and presented like a museum exhibit with mood lighting. From city councils to corporate boards, from college brochures to campaign mailers, the state has insisted, unmistakably and repeatedly, that representation is not just a value but a virtue measurable in headcounts and headlines.

    And yet, when one turns to the gubernatorial race to replace Gavin Newsom, something curious emerges, like a magician’s trick performed a beat too slowly.

    Where, exactly, have all the minorities gone?

    Because if California’s political rhetoric were a recipe, one would expect this race to be a rich stew of backgrounds, perspectives, and identities, simmering together in a pot labeled “progress.” Instead, what we appear to have, at least among the top-tier candidates qualifying for major debates, is a lineup that looks less like a mosaic and more like a casting call that forgot its own script.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • Gotta Break Some Glass - Ep 26-133
    2026/04/03

    I’m titling this hour “breaking glass”, because we have to break politics to fix it.

    We have to break our movement to fix it, and we’ve done that. President Trump broke DC and is fixing it, and there are many of us breaking the conservative movement in order to make it better.

    We are outing the charlatans.

    Tweet from Ambassador Huckabee:

    Wow. Tucker Carlson just called-wants to come to Jerusalem to share Easter Sunday with me. Said he's been wrong about Israel, Jews, Iran, criticizing @realDonaldTrump & wants to publicly renounce stuff he's been saying and do it right in heart of Israel!

    I’m not sure what’s happening with Tucker these days, but you can have all the money you want; it is your reputation that is most important.

    More on Tucker

    Let’s look at what podcasters Erin Molan posted about Megyn Kelly.

    [X] SB – Erin Molan on Megyn Kelly


    [X] SB – Scott Jennings debates Iran results

    Woman knows nothing about Iran

    I’m amazed at how wrong people can be and not care.

    I did an entire show on debating, and particularly debating Leftists. It was revealing in the sense that you learn that stupid will double down.


    Tourism

    Multiple companies exist that do this.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • Trumpism Around the World - Ep 26-132
    2026/04/02

    World leaders idolize Trump.

    Elon Musk idolizes one man. Trump.

    Other billionaires idolize Trump.

    [X] SB – Anton Daniels on why he supports Trump


    Why do we support Trump? Very few people who can’t be bought.


    If you listen carefully, beneath the polite applause of political analysts and the carefully hedged language of mainstream media, you can hear the wave.

    The sound beneath the surface of global politics that resembles a tornado riding inside the eye of a hurricane being driven by a tsunami.

    It is the sound of voters, across continents, deciding they have had enough.

    And while the outcomes vary, and while the media will strain itself into rhetorical yoga poses to avoid saying it plainly, the direction of travel is clear. The ideological export once dismissed as “American-style conservatism” is no longer a uniquely American phenomenon. It is becoming, in fits and starts, the default corrective mechanism of democratic societies pushed too far, too fast, in one direction. It's called Trumpism.

    Let’s start where the shift is most undeniable.

    Germany: The Cracks in the Socialist Wall

    In Rhineland-Palatinate, a region that had been under Social Democratic control for thirty-five years, the result was not merely a change in leadership. It was a political eviction notice.

    The CDU’s victory at 31%, overtaking the SPD’s 26%, is being described as a “win.” That undersells it. This was a repudiation. When a party holds power for over three decades, it embeds itself not just in governance but in culture, in bureaucracy, in expectation. To dislodge it requires more than a good campaign. It requires a public that has lost patience.

    And that patience has clearly expired.

    Even more telling is the parallel surge of the AfD, which continues to grow not because it is universally loved, but because it is unmistakably different from the ruling consensus. When voters feel ignored, they do not drift gently toward moderation. They lurch toward disruption.

    In Baden-Württemberg, the story becomes even more revealing. The Greens technically held first place, but only barely, and the CDU surged to within a statistical whisper. Meanwhile, the SPD collapsed to a humiliating 5.5%, a number that would have been unthinkable even a decade ago.

    This is what systemic rejection looks like. Not a neat ideological swap, but a fragmentation in which the old guard, particularly the socialist wing, finds itself politically homeless.

    And then there is the AfD again, nearly doubling its share to around 18.8% in one of Germany’s wealthiest regions. That is not a protest vote confined to struggling areas. That is a signal from the middle class, the engine room of any economy, that something is deeply out of alignment.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • Connecting the Dots - Ep 26-131
    2026/04/02

    Forget the Iran conflict, as that will end soon. And with that cessation will come yet another victory for President Trump.

    While Iran is a key issue, and its impact on the economy is clear, it’s all temporary.

    What Democrats hate is that Trump never gets distracted, because he is so good at juggling multiple issues.

    Fun fact: President Trump is said to have the highest IQ of any president in history.

    In case you’ve missed it, it being my show, I explain how President Trump connected the dots on how Leftism has won for decades despite being the ideology for the insane.

    To understand Leftism, know that it is about two things: money and power.


    Either can lead to the other when in the possession of evil people.

    Democrats got into power, and they have done everything they could to maintain it.

    Check out this clip on how Republicans were banned from polling stations:

    [X] SB – Congresswoman speaks on DNC injunction.

    Mid-1980s. Fed Judge in NJ.


    Something else people don't know is that start in the mid-1980s, there was a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers.

    So from mid-80’s until 2020, Republicans were not allowed to be poll watchers on these national elections.

    And what happened was that judge eventually died and the Democrats, the DNC, they had to go get that injunction renewed every 5-8 years, something along those lines. And when that judge died, he was replaced by an Obama judge, and they went back to that judge and they said, we want this consent decree in place making so Republicans cannot be poll watchers and cannot be a part of this process. And he said, what in the heck are you talking about? This is absolutely so unconstitutional. And he refused to renew that consent decree. He refused to renew that injunction.

    So 2020 was one of the first years that we had professional Republican poll watchers in these elections to see what was going on in Atlanta, in Detroit, in Milwaukee, in, you know, in in Philadelphia. It was the first time we were able to really see what was going on in these polling places. What that tells me is that probably a lot of these shenanigans were been going on for a long, long time, but there were no Republicans there to report on it.” Our elections have always been rigged by Democrats.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • Debating Fools (Democrats) - Ep 26-190
    2026/04/01

    Let me start you off with a scene. You’re in a debate with someone who has the confidence of a Nobel laureate and the intellectual scaffolding of a soggy cardboard box. They speak quickly, assert boldly, and absorb nothing. You’re thinking, “This is going to be easy.” Ten minutes later, you’re Googling whether blood pressure medication comes in industrial drums.

    Welcome to the modern political argument.

    And if you’ve ever walked away from one of these encounters feeling like you just tried to teach algebra to a smoke alarm, congratulations. You’ve met the human embodiment of the Dunning-Krueger Effect. This is the phenomenon where people with limited knowledge dramatically overestimate their competence. In other words, the less they know, the more convinced they are that they know everything.

    Now layer that with the work of Daniel Kahneman, particularly from his book Thinking, Fast and Slow. Kahneman breaks thinking into two systems. System 1 is fast, emotional, reactive. System 2 is slow, analytical, deliberate.

    Guess which one dominates political arguments?

    Exactly.

    System 1 doesn’t care about facts. It cares about survival. It treats disagreement like a personal attack, like you just insulted their grandmother and their Wi-Fi in the same sentence. So when you bring logic into that arena, you’re not debating… you’re threatening identity.

    That’s your first mistake.

    Because what you think is a discussion about immigration policy is, for them, a cage match for psychological dominance. Truth isn’t currency. Emotional control is.

    And long before Twitter turned arguments into public blood sport, Arthur Schopenhauer laid this out in his essay on eristic dialectics, essentially the art of winning arguments without regard for truth. His thesis was brutally simple: people don’t argue to discover truth. They argue to win.

    Here’s the kicker. When you present airtight logic to someone operating on emotional instinct, you don’t win. You validate their battlefield. You’ve agreed to play chess with someone who flips the board and declares victory because your king “looked nervous.”

    So what happens next?

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • Debate Tactics - Ep 26-129
    2026/04/01

    Democrats make it impossible to fool people on April Fool’s. Because they are dope fiends.

    They need to recover from the dope of Leftism, which I discussed recently.

    And yet, recovery remains possible.

    History shows societies periodically rediscover sobriety. Economic crises expose unsustainable fantasies. Cultural exhaustion replaces ideological enthusiasm. People begin asking forbidden questions again, quietly at first, then publicly.

    They notice that stability feels better than chaos. That responsibility produces dignity. That truth, however inconvenient, proves less frightening than illusion.

    Sobriety does not arrive with fireworks. It arrives with recognition. A parent questioning curriculum. A worker noticing incentives no longer reward effort. A citizen realizing that policies promising compassion somehow produce disorder.

    One by one, individuals step outside the fog.

    The greatest challenge is psychological, because abandoning ideological intoxication feels like losing identity itself. Addiction convinces users that sobriety equals emptiness. In reality, sobriety restores perception.

    Colors sharpen. Cause reconnects with effect. Moral clarity returns not as cruelty but as coherence.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • Drunk on Leftism - Ep 26-128
    2026/03/31

    Millions of Americans swear they’re sober, rational, and informed. Yet their thinking staggers, their memory fades, and reality feels negotiable. The country isn’t drunk on substances. It’s intoxicated by an ideology.

    There was a time in America when reality required no translation guide.

    Gravity worked. Effort mattered. Boys were boys, girls were girls, and if your neighbor built a better fence, you complimented him instead of filing an emotional grievance with the Department of Feelings. Life wasn’t perfect, but it was comprehensible. Cause produced effect. Actions carried consequences. The universe ran on rules sturdy enough to survive disagreement.

    Then America discovered a drug so powerful that users insist they’re completely sober while walking straight into walls.

    Leftism.

    Not merely a political philosophy, not simply a collection of policies, but a full-spectrum intoxicant. A worldview that alters perception first, judgment second, and memory last. And like any effective narcotic, its users rarely realize they’re high.

    The brilliance of the product lies in its delivery system. Nobody hands you a syringe labeled “Ideological Dependency.” Instead, the dose arrives disguised as compassion, fairness, progress, or whatever emotionally irresistible wrapping paper fits the decade. By the time the side effects appear, the addiction has already settled into the bloodstream.

    Many Americans alive today never experienced ideological sobriety. They were born into the haze. But others remember an earlier America, one guided by conservative principles that functioned less like political preferences and more like natural laws.

    Conservatism resembles gravity. It does not negotiate. It does not trend. It simply works whether acknowledged or not. Like ocean tides or the Earth’s rotation, it provides stability precisely because it refuses to reinvent itself every Tuesday afternoon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • Winning the Culture - Ep 26-127
    2026/03/31

    So the Left rolled out “No Kings 2: The Sequel Nobody Asked For,” and folks… it had all the cultural impact of a screensaver from 2003. You remember those? Floating pipes, no purpose, just… there. That’s this movement. Floating. Drifting. Making noise without saying anything.

    Let’s walk through the spectacle.

    According to The Guardian, these “No Kings” protests were supposed to hit 3,000 locations nationwide. Three thousand. That’s not a protest, that’s a franchise model. That’s Subway sandwiches. That’s “Would you like to make it a combo?” levels of scale. And the flagship event? St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Now that’s an interesting choice. St. Paul… ground zero for scrutiny over Somali fraud scandals, ICE enforcement issues, and a local political structure that’s been doing the bureaucratic cha-cha while real problems pile up like unread emails. So naturally, the Left says, “You know what this place needs? A protest about monarchy.”

    Because nothing screams “relevance” like yelling about kings in a country that fought a war to not have one nearly 250 years ago. That’s commitment to the bit. Revolutionary War cosplay with worse costumes.

    And let’s talk turnout.

    When you plan something months in advance, pump it through media channels, coordinate across thousands of locations, and the result looks like a middle school talent show where half the kids forgot their lines… that’s not a movement. That’s a production problem.

    See, real movements don’t need this much choreography. They don’t need a Google Calendar invite and a Slack channel to get people to show up. Real movements are messy, inconvenient, alive. They pop up because people feel something, not because they were emailed a PDF with protest instructions and a color palette.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分