The Tickle v Giggle Ruling Explained | Sall Grover (Part 2)
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
The Tickle v Giggle Ruling Explained | Sall Grover (Part 2)
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
In part two of my conversation with Sall Grover, we discuss the political and legal fallout from the latest Tickle v Giggle decision, and what it means for women’s rights in Australia.
Sall explains why she intends to take the case to the High Court, how the Lesbian Action Group’s case intersects with her own, and why she believes politicians can no longer dismiss this as a “culture war” issue.
We also discuss women only spaces, lesbian events, the Sex Discrimination Act, the Australian Human Rights Commission, the media, and the question at the centre of the whole fight: what is a woman under Australian law?
Support Sall Grover’s legal fight: https://gigglecrowdfund.com
Follow Sall Grover: https://x.com/salltweets
Follow Quite Frankly with Monica Lewis:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/quitefranklypodcast/
X: https://x.com/quitefranklyau
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61584616214800
Feedback welcome: monica@quitefrankly.net