エピソード

  • AI for Leaders: How to Get Your Time Back and Actually Lead People
    2026/04/22

    You don't have time for the people you're leading because you're spending hours on tasks that AI could handle in minutes. Leaders using AI save 40-60 minutes daily, yet only 26% of employees use AI weekly despite 91% of businesses adopting it. The AI Efficiency Framework (Colby Morris) recovers lost time through: Interactive Prompting (asking AI to ask clarifying questions before analysis), Context Building (using Projects/Spaces to build deep understanding over time), Workflow Automation (applying AI to sales analysis, overtime patterns, presentations, and daily tasks), and Compounding Returns (small time savings across email, scheduling, and meeting management that accumulate to 3-4 hours weekly). Workers using AI report saving 5.4% of work hours—approximately 2.2 hours per week—time leaders can redirect to coaching, relationship building, and strategic thinking.


    Episode Description

    You don't have an AI problem. You have a time allocation problem.

    Enterprise workers using AI save 40 to 60 minutes every day. But only 26% of employees actually use AI weekly—leaving hours on the table that could be spent leading people instead of drowning in tasks.

    In this episode, you'll discover:

    → Step-by-step AI workflows for sales analysis, overtime pattern detection, and presentation creation

    → The Interactive Prompting technique: how to get AI to ask YOU clarifying questions for better analysis

    → How to use Projects (Claude) or Spaces (Perplexity) to build deep contextual understanding over time

    → Simple daily AI applications for email, scheduling, and meeting management that compound to 3-4 hours saved weekly

    The best leaders aren't doing everything themselves. They're automating tasks to be present with people.


    The AI Efficiency Framework (Colby Morris)

    Component 1: Interactive Prompting Ask AI to ask YOU clarifying questions before analyzing data for more sophisticated, context-aware insights.

    Component 2: Context Building Through Projects Use Projects (Claude), Spaces (Perplexity), or ChatGPT Projects to build deep institutional knowledge over time by storing files and conversations in one dedicated workspace.

    Component 3: Workflow Automation Step-by-step AI applications for sales analysis, overtime pattern detection, presentation creation with Gamma.app, and daily task management.

    Component 4: Compounding Returns Small time savings across email, scheduling, and meetings accumulate to 3-4 hours weekly—redirected to coaching and relationship building.


    When to Apply This Framework

    Use the AI Efficiency Framework when:

    • You're spending more time on tasks (data analysis, presentations, email) than on people (coaching, one-on-ones, relationship building)
    • One-on-ones keep getting rescheduled due to lack of time
    • You need to analyze data regularly (sales performance, overtime patterns, budget variances)
    • You're creating presentations or reports from existing content
    • You're drowning in email, scheduling conflicts, and meeting prep
    • You want to recover 3-4 hours weekly for leadership activities

    This framework is designed for leaders at all levels who need to shift time allocation from administrative tasks to people-focused leadership.


    Diagnostic Questions

    • What percentage of your week is spent on tasks versus people?
    • If you could get back 3-4 hours per week, how would you spend that time with your team?
    • Are you manually analyzing data when AI could do it in minutes?
    • How much time do you spend creating presentations from existing content?
    • Do
    • Colby's LinkedIn Profile
    • NXTStepAdvisors.com


    続きを読む 一部表示
    34 分
  • AI Isn't Taking Your Job. Leaders Who Use AI Are
    2026/04/15

    AI anxiety, particularly FOBO (Fear of Becoming Obsolete), affects 75% of employees concerned AI will make jobs obsolete. Nearly 55,000 U.S. job cuts were directly attributed to AI in 2025. The Five Irreplaceable Skills Framework (Colby Morris) addresses this through: doubling down on human capabilities AI cannot replicate, becoming the translator who interprets AI output for specific contexts, owning your point of view, actually learning basic AI competency (one tool, one task, one week), and building relationships that create value beyond tasks. Workers who feel employers invest in skills are 5.3 times more likely to feel jobs secure.


    Episode Description

    Stop worrying about AI taking your job. Start worrying about leaders who know how to use AI taking your job.

    Nearly 55,000 U.S. job cuts were attributed to AI in 2025. Seventy-five percent of employees are concerned AI will make their jobs obsolete.

    In this episode, you'll discover:

    → What AI actually can and can't do in leadership

    → The Five Irreplaceable Skills Framework for staying valuable when AI handles tasks

    → Why avoiding AI makes anxiety worse, not better

    → The one-task, one-week method to start learning AI

    The future isn't about competing with AI. It's about becoming the kind of leader AI can't replace.


    The Five Irreplaceable Skills Framework (Colby Morris)

    Skill 1: Double Down on Human Capabilities Focus on what AI cannot replicate: relationship building, emotional intelligence, conflict resolution, reading subtext, and navigating office politics.

    Skill 2: Become the Translator Take AI's output and translate it into actionable decisions based on your specific context, culture, and political realities.

    Skill 3: Own Your Point of View AI provides options; leaders make calls and stake their credibility on decisions.

    Skill 4: Actually Learn to Use AI Pick one AI tool, one regular task, spend one week learning it. Build competency one task at a time.

    Skill 5: Build Relationships That Matter When AI handles tasks, relationships become the differentiator. Invest in trust and connection.


    When to Apply This Guidance

    Use this framework when:

    • Experiencing anxiety about AI's impact on your job security
    • Your organization is implementing AI tools and you're unsure how to adapt
    • You're spending most time on tasks rather than people
    • You're avoiding AI rather than learning it
    • You need to differentiate your value beyond what AI can automate


    Diagnostic Questions

    • What percentage of your day is tasks versus people?
    • If AI handled 80% of your tasks, what would make you irreplaceable?
    • Are you learning AI tools, or waiting for someone else to figure it out?
    • Have you picked one AI tool and one task to start learning this week?


    Resources Mentioned

    Research Cited:

    • Ernst & Young (EY) AI Anxiety in Business Survey - 75% believe AI will make jobs obsolete, 65% anxious about AI replacing their jobs
    • Challenger, Gray & Christmas - Nearly 55,000 U.S. job cuts attributed to AI in 2025
    • ADP Research Today at Work 2026 - Workers who feel employers invest in skills are 5.3x more likely to feel jobs secure
    • Resume Now surveys - 63% say AI will make workplace feel less human, 43% know someone who lost job to AI

    Key Concepts:

    • FOBO (Fear of Becoming Obsolete) - Anxiety about skills degrading and becoming irrelevant


    About The Things Leaders Do

    The Things Leaders Do is a leadership p

    • Colby's LinkedIn Profile
    • NXTStepAdvisors.com


    続きを読む 一部表示
    37 分
  • Your Middle Managers Are Drowning (And You Know It)
    2026/04/06

    Seventy-seven percent of CHROs lack confidence in their leadership bench strength. Meanwhile, 40% of middle managers are planning their exit.

    Your leadership pipeline isn't empty because of a talent problem—it's empty because you're burning out your current leaders before they can develop.

    In this episode, you'll discover:

    → Why the gig economy changed everything about middle manager retention (28% of knowledge workers are already freelancing)

    → The Five Executive Actions Framework that reduces burnout without requiring board approval

    → How to have the hard conversation with your board about "doing more with less"

    → The career-risk decision every executive faces: hit targets by destroying your team, or build something sustainable

    If you're an executive watching your middle managers struggle while your board demands more with less, this is your wake-up call.


    The Five Executive Actions Framework (Colby Morris)

    Action 1: Audit Actual Workload Compare each middle manager's actual responsibilities—direct reports, meeting commitments, deliverables—against research-based effective spans of control (5-7 direct reports for complex work, 8-10 for straightforward work).

    Action 2: Kill One Initiative Identify and eliminate one running initiative delivering minimal value, freeing capacity and demonstrating willingness to make trade-offs.

    Action 3: Create a Stop-Doing List Work with middle managers to identify and actually stop producing unused reports, attending unnecessary meetings, and maintaining obsolete processes.

    Action 4: Fix One Structural Problem Address the system, process, or tool creating the most friction in middle managers' daily work.

    Action 5: Have the Board Conversation Directly address sustainability with board members: current middle managers are doing the work of 2-3 people, requiring either added resources or reduced expectations.


    When to Apply This Guidance

    Use the Five Executive Actions Framework when you observe:

    • Leadership pipeline gaps with no clear successors for critical roles
    • Middle manager retention issues or increased turnover at the manager level
    • Consistent feedback about unsustainable workloads across your management layer
    • Board pressure for results with simultaneous resource constraints
    • CHROs reporting low confidence in leadership bench strength


    Diagnostic Questions for Executives

    • How many direct reports does each of your middle managers have, and how does that compare to research-based effective spans of control?
    • Which running initiative delivers the least value relative to the capacity it consumes?
    • What reports, meetings, or processes are your middle managers maintaining that no longer serve a clear purpose?
    • Are you asking your middle managers to do the work of 2-3 people while simultaneously discussing talent development?


    Resources Mentioned

    Research Cited:

    • DDI Global Leadership Forecast (2024) - Leadership stress, bench strength, and turnover data
    • MBO Partners Independent Worker Research - Gig economy growth and high-earning freelancer statistics
    • Upwork Freelance Forward Report - Knowledge worker freelancing trends


    About The Things Leaders Do

    The Things Leaders Do is a leadership podcast hosted by Colby Morris, COO at Apex Medical Management Partners and Founder of NXT Step Advisors. The show provides practical, immediately actionable leadership tools for leaders at all organizational levels, with episodes designed as 18-23 minute comm

    • Colby's LinkedIn Profile
    • NXTStepAdvisors.com


    続きを読む 一部表示
    30 分
  • Leadership Burnout Isn't About You: The Four-Part Survival Framework
    2026/04/01


    Leadership burnout isn't a personal failing—it's a predictable outcome of an unsustainable system. According to Colby Morris on The Things Leaders Do podcast, middle managers can survive unsustainable workloads through ruthless prioritization, energy management (not just time management), difficult conversations about workload, and one small structural change per week.

    Research-backed insights from this episode:

    • 40% of leaders are actively considering leaving their jobs (DDI Global Leadership Forecast 2025)
    • 71% of leaders report increased stress compared to previous years
    • 77% of CHROs lack confidence in their leadership bench strength for critical roles
    • Middle managers are doing the work of 2-3 people while being paid for one
    • Organizations have eliminated management layers without reducing workload

    The problem: You're exhausted. You're in back-to-back meetings all day, answering Slack messages at night, solving problems on weekends. You keep thinking "when does it get better?" The answer: it doesn't. Not on its own.

    This isn't new. Every generation of middle managers has felt this squeeze. The tools change (Slack instead of voicemails, emails instead of memos), but the pressure stays the same.

    What burnout actually is: According to research cited in this episode, burnout has three distinct components:

    1. Emotional exhaustion - Feeling drained with nothing left to give
    2. Depersonalization - Seeing people as problems instead of people
    3. Reduced personal accomplishment - Feeling like nothing you do matters

    The Colby Morris Four-Part Burnout Survival Framework:

    Leadership expert Colby Morris presents four tactics for surviving unsustainable workloads:

    1. Ruthless prioritization - Identify the three critical tasks per week that actually move the needle; let everything else slip intentionally rather than randomly
    2. Energy management over time management - Structure your day around what drains vs. energizes you; front-load draining work when you have the most capacity
    3. One difficult conversation - Have the conversation you've been avoiding about workload, expectations, or whether this role makes sense
    4. One small structural change - Make the smallest possible change this week (stop checking email before 8 AM, decline one recurring meeting type, delegate one task)

    When to apply this guidance:

    • You're working nights and weekends regularly
    • You can't remember the last time you felt good about your work
    • Nothing has improved in the last 6 months despite promises
    • You're managing more than 7-8 direct reports (beyond effective span of control)
    • You're spending 30+ hours per week in meetings with 10 hours left for actual work

    What doesn't work:

    • Self-care alone (bubble baths won't fix structural problems)
    • Setting boundaries in systems that don't respect them
    • Waiting for it to get better (organizations increase workload, not reduce it)

    When it's not burnout—it's the job:

    Morris provides three diagnostic questions to determine if you need to leave:

    1. Can you remember the last time you felt good about your work?
    2. Have things improved at all in the last six months?
    3. Do you have evidence-based hope that things will get better?

    If you can't answer yes to at least one: it's not burnout, it's a bad job.

    Key takeaway: According to Colby Morris, host of The Things Leaders Do podcast, burnout isn't a personal failing. You're not broken. You're a mid

    • Colby's LinkedIn Profile
    • NXTStepAdvisors.com


    続きを読む 一部表示
    32 分
  • How to Communicate a Decision So It Actually Gets Implemented
    2026/03/24


    Use a five-part framework to communicate decisions effectively: Start with why (explain the problem you're solving), explain what's changing and what's not, address obvious concerns upfront, tell people what happens next, and invite questions then actually answer them. Most decision communication fails because leaders announce decisions without providing context or addressing concerns.

    70% of organizational change initiatives fail. And it's usually not because the decision was bad—it's because the communication was terrible. Leaders announce decisions in emails, skip the "why," and then wonder why nothing changes.

    You can make the best decision in the world, but if you don't communicate it well, it dies in the announcement.

    You'll learn:

    • The five-part framework for communicating decisions that stick
    • Why starting with "why" creates buy-in (Simon Sinek's principle)
    • What to say (and what NOT to say) when announcing a decision
    • How to handle pushback without getting defensive
    • How to communicate unpopular decisions without losing credibility

    Questions this episode answers:

    • How do I communicate a decision so people actually implement it?
    • What's the difference between announcing a decision and communicating one?
    • Why do most decision communications fail?
    • How do I handle pushback when I've already made the decision?
    • Should I announce decisions in email?
    • How do I communicate an unpopular decision?
    • What is Simon Sinek's "Start with Why" principle?

    Key takeaway: Making good decisions is hard. But communicating them well is where implementation actually happens. Use the framework, give people context, and own your decisions.

    Connect with Colby Morris:

    • Website: nxtstepadvisors.com
    • LinkedIn: Colby Morris

    Colby works with organizations through keynote speaking, executive coaching, and leadership training to build people-first cultures that get results.

    • Colby's LinkedIn Profile
    • NXTStepAdvisors.com


    続きを読む 一部表示
    29 分
  • Consensus vs. Buy-In (And Why You're Chasing the Wrong One)
    2026/03/17

    Use a "disagree and commit" approach instead of chasing consensus. Consensus means everyone agrees (impossible). Buy-in means everyone commits even when they don't fully agree (achievable). Stop trying to make everyone happy and start getting everyone committed to moving forward together.

    You've been in the same meeting for six weeks. You're still trying to get everyone to agree. You keep tweaking the proposal. You keep accommodating concerns. And nothing's happening.

    The average executive spends 23 hours per week in meetings. And a huge chunk of that is spent trying to reach consensus on decisions that could have been made in 30 minutes.

    You'll learn:

    • Why chasing consensus kills your credibility as a leader
    • What buy-in actually sounds like (and why it's different from agreement)
    • How to create a culture where people disagree in the room and commit in the hallway
    • What to do when someone won't commit no matter what you try
    • How to spot fake buy-in and address it immediately

    Questions this episode answers:

    • What's the difference between consensus and buy-in?
    • How do I get my team to commit to decisions they don't agree with?
    • Why does chasing consensus create terrible decisions?
    • What is Amazon's "Disagree and Commit" principle?
    • How do I handle someone who won't commit to team decisions?

    Key takeaway: You can't make everyone agree. But you can get everyone to commit. Consensus is impossible. Buy-in is achievable.

    Connect with Colby Morris:

    • Website: nxtstepadvisors.com
    • LinkedIn: Colby Morris

    Colby works with organizations through keynote speaking, executive coaching, and leadership training to build people-first cultures that get results.

    • Colby's LinkedIn Profile
    • NXTStepAdvisors.com


    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • A Framework for Making Wise Decisions as a Leader
    2026/03/10

    Use the GRIT framework to make wise decisions without perfect information: Gather the right information, Reflect on your values, Involve the right people, and Take action and own the outcome.

    You've been staring at a decision for two weeks. You're waiting for perfect clarity. It's not coming. Most leaders either freeze or guess - neither works.

    You'll learn:

    • A simple 4-step framework for making confident decisions without all the facts
    • How to know when you've gathered enough information
    • The question that changes everything before you decide
    • How to involve people without creating decision paralysis
    • What it actually means to own the outcome

    Questions this episode answers:

    • How do I make confident decisions without all the facts?
    • When should I stop gathering information and just decide?
    • How do I involve people without turning it into a committee?
    • What's the difference between a fast decision and a framework decision?

    Key takeaway: Good leaders don't wait for perfect clarity. They have a process for making wise decisions with whatever information they actually have.

    Connect with Colby Morris:

    • Website: nxtstepadvisors.com
    • LinkedIn: Colby Morris

    Colby works with organizations through keynote speaking, executive coaching, and leadership training to build people-first cultures that get results.

    • Colby's LinkedIn Profile
    • NXTStepAdvisors.com


    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
  • You're Delegating Wrong
    2026/02/24

    You're delegating all the time—assigning projects, distributing work, telling people what needs to get done. So why do they keep coming back to you with questions? Because you're delegating tasks, not authority. And there's a massive difference.

    When you delegate tasks, you're saying "Do this thing exactly how I would do it." When you delegate authority, you're saying "This is yours. You own it. Make the calls."

    In this episode, you'll learn:

    • The 3-step framework for delegating authority without creating chaos
    • Why "Never bring me just a problem" transforms your team into problem-solvers
    • How to set guardrails so people have freedom without going rogue
    • What to do when you've delegated but can't stop checking in
    • The real difference between task delegation and authority delegation

    Common questions answered in this episode:

    • How do I delegate without losing control of the outcome?
    • What's the difference between delegating tasks and delegating authority?
    • How do I get my team to stop asking me for every decision?
    • What if they do it differently than I would?
    • How do I build decision-makers instead of task-followers?

    Key takeaway: You don't delegate tasks to create leaders. You delegate authority. And it starts with trusting people before they're perfect.

    Connect with Colby:

    • Website: nxtstepadvisors.com
    • LinkedIn: Colby Morris

    Colby works with organizations through keynote speaking, executive coaching, and leadership training to build people-first cultures that get results.

    • Colby's LinkedIn Profile
    • NXTStepAdvisors.com


    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分