Topic A08 - Match the Mission: FP vs CR Risk (Debate)
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Topic A08 - Match the Mission: FP vs CR Risk (Debate)
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Fixed-Price. Cost-Reimbursement. Incentives. Time-and-Materials. Every contract type comes with a different balance of risk, control, flexibility, and performance.
In this special debate-style episode of COPS – The Contracting Officer Platform, we put the most common contract types head-to-head and challenge the assumptions behind each one. Is Fixed-Price really the gold standard? Does Cost-Reimbursement encourage innovation or invite overruns? When do Incentive contracts actually drive performance, and when do they simply add complexity?
Through spirited arguments, rebuttals, real-world acquisition scenarios, and practical contracting insights, we'll explore how acquisition professionals match contract types to mission requirements, allocate risk between the Government and industry, and avoid the costly mistake of forcing the wrong contract type onto the wrong requirement.
Because in contracting, the best contract type isn't the one you like most—it's the one that best matches the mission.