『We've Got To Talk』のカバーアート

We've Got To Talk

We've Got To Talk

著者： Nicole Fonarow and Jolene Conway
無料で聴く

今ならプレミアムプランが3カ月 月額99円

2026年5月12日まで。4か月目以降は月額1,500円で自動更新します。

概要

 Our story begins in the halls of the University of Iowa, go Hawks! It was there that two seemingly different paths intersected and a friendship blossomed. Despite our different upbringings—Jolene in little Pleasantville, Iowa, and me, Nicole, just across the Golden Gate Bridge in the bustling Bay Area—we became fast friends. And here we are, almost 40 years later, living in a world that often seems intent on drawing lines in the sand and choosing sides. So why "We've Got To Talk"? Because we truly believe that in this deeply divided society, the power of conversation can unite us. Our goal isn't to change each other's opinions, but to listen with curiosity, kindness, and empathy. And yes, to have a good time while doing it! We invite you to join us on this journey and bring your friends along. We might not have all the answers or any of them—but we promise honesty, empathy, and a lot of heart. We hope our conversations give you a fresh outlook or at least entertain you as you go about your day.Copyright 2026 Nicole Fonarow and Jolene Conway 政治・政府 政治学 社会科学
エピソード
  • Republican vs Democrat Views of Trump: What the Beyond MAGA Report Reveals

    Republican vs Democrat Views of Trump: What the Beyond MAGA Report Reveals
    2026/04/15
    In this episode, we dig into the “Beyond MAGA” report from More in Common and why it matters heading into the November midterms. If you spend any time online, you would think Trump voters are one giant, identical block of people. Angry, extreme, predictable. But that is not what the data shows. This report breaks the Trump coalition into more nuanced groups like MAGA Hardliners, Anti-Woke Conservatives, Mainstream Republicans, and the Reluctant Right, and that alone changes the conversation.We talk about what actually shapes political identity inside the Republican coalition, including faith, distrust in institutions, community identity, and the feeling that traditional beliefs are often dismissed or mocked. Instead of flattening Trump supporters into one stereotype, we look at the deeper emotional and cultural forces behind why people vote the way they do, and why the liberal view of Trump voters often misses that complexity.Immigration and “wokeness” are two of the biggest themes we unpack. The report shows that many Trump supporters are not anti-immigrant in the simplistic way they are often portrayed. Many hold positive views toward legal immigration while also feeling frustrated by disorder and a system they no longer trust. We also talk about how cultural messaging, tone, and performative politics have shaped the Republican vs liberal divide around Trump, especially when people feel talked down to rather than understood.At the heart of this episode is a bigger question about political stereotypes, media narratives, and what happens to democracy when we stop being curious about each other. We do not all agree, but we do share more underlying frustrations than people want to admit. If we want a healthier political culture before the November midterms, we need less screaming, less certainty, and a lot more honesty about what is really driving voters on both sides.CHAPTER MARKERS:00:00 Introduction: Beyond MAGA, Trump Voters, and the November Midterms00:28 Beyond MAGA Report Breakdown01:41 Why Nuance Matters in Republican vs Liberal Conversations03:23 Trump Voter Types Quiz: MAGA Hardliners, Mainstream Republicans and More04:50 Beyond MAGA Methodology: Can This Trump Voter Research Be Trusted?07:49 Immigration and Trump Voters: Perception vs Reality11:07 Legal vs Illegal Immigration Debate in the Republican Coalition16:12 What Drove the Trump Vote? Faith, Distrust, and Cultural Frustration18:30 Trump Coalition of Frustrations: Why Voters Feel Let Down20:11 Single-Issue Voting and the 2026 Midterms21:36 Religion, Identity, and Why Faith Feels Countercultural22:33 Loneliness, Belonging, and Political Identity in America23:16 Democrats, the Working Class, and Why Voters Feel Abandoned24:40 Wokeness Debate: Media, Culture, and Anti-Woke Conservatives27:23 Why Americans Hate Their Political Opponents28:24 Cancel Culture, Political Nuance, and the Liberal vs Conservative Divide30:34 New Media, Political Change, and Hope for 202833:00 Would You Rather: Final Thoughts on MAGA, Midterms, and Political IdentityRESOURCES MENTIONED:https://www.moreincommon.com/https://moreincommonus.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/More-in-Common-Beyond-MAGA-A-Profile-of-the-Trump-Coalition-Jan-2026-Wave-6.pdfhttps://san.com/https://www.mo.news/ https://www.readtangle.com/Our Website:https://www.wevegottotalk.com/LINKS:On Instagram https://www.instagram.com/wevegottotalk/ On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@WeveGotToTalkOn Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/weve-got-to-talk/id1797423701On Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0qJVgTvjciUffRmoUienx2Our Website: https://www.wevegottotalk.com/How to find Nicole https://nicolefonarow.com/, How to find Jolene https://dibledough.com/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分
  • This NYC Protest Shocked Us: “Death to America” and What It Means

    This NYC Protest Shocked Us: “Death to America” and What It Means
    2026/04/08
    We’re taking on one of the hardest questions in public life right now: where is the line between free speech, hate speech, and political extremism? What started as a reaction to protest footage from Washington Square Park turned into a much bigger conversation about modern activism, public outrage, and the way protest movements can shift from justice and grief into something more tribal, performative, and deeply unsettling.We talk about how quickly fear and ignorance can turn into hatred, and how anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim sentiment, and political dehumanization keep gaining ground when people stop seeing each other as human beings. This episode looks at the emotional climate behind extremism, the danger of treating entire groups as symbols, and why hate grows so easily in environments driven by anger, misinformation, and identity politics. It is not just about what people are saying at protests. It is about what happens when outrage becomes a culture.We also explore the conservative and liberal views of protest culture in America. Jolene shares why many conservatives see large-scale street protest as more closely tied to the political left, while I (Nicole) reflect on how the internet, media amplification, and organised messaging have changed the nature of activism altogether. We get into political funding, online radicalization, protest movements, groupthink, and the way social media can turn legitimate causes into ideological theatre almost overnight.At the center of this episode is a deeper concern about free speech in America and whether public debate is still possible when every disagreement feels morally loaded. We do not pretend to have neat answers, but we do ask the questions that matter: when does protest stop helping, when does rhetoric become dangerous, and how do we push back against extremism without losing the values that make open societies worth protecting?CHAPTER MARKERS:00:00 Introduction00:25 Political Extremism, Protests, and Free Speech in America00:49 Washington Square Park Protest Reaction02:03 Hate Speech, Extremism, and Public Outrage04:56 How Protest Movements Gain Power and Momentum10:30 Who Funds Activism and Political Protest Movements13:30 Hate Speech vs Free Speech: Where Is the Line?17:10 Do Protests Actually Change Anything?20:34 Dark Money, Political Funding, and Protest Strategy22:56 How Republicans Mobilise Without Protest Culture23:22 Protest as Community, Belonging, and Identity23:53 The Money Behind Activism and Organised Movements25:57 Trad Wife Media, Online Messaging, and Cultural Influence28:47 Confusion, Radicalisation, and How People Get Pulled In33:18 Dehumanisation, Hate, and the Rise of Extremism35:09 Podcast Recommendation and 544 Days of Perspective37:26 The Personal Toll of Political Division38:41 Would You Rather: Free Speech, Hate, and Moral Trade-Offs41:07 Final Thoughts on Protest Culture, Extremism, and Free SpeechRESOURCES MENTIONED:Washington Square Park Protest: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DV5CHOADH2J/?igsh=YXhiMjJ0bHVuYmhlMo News - Americans Morally Bad:https://www.instagram.com/p/DWCnC0wicdw/Nate Friedman Show:https://www.instagram.com/p/DVxOUD_jJbj/544 Days Podcast:https://crooked.com/podcast-series/544-days/Our Website:https://www.wevegottotalk.comLINKS:On Instagram https://www.instagram.com/wevegottotalk/ On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@WeveGotToTalkOn Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/weve-got-to-talk/id1797423701On Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0qJVgTvjciUffRmoUienx2Our Website: https://www.wevegottotalk.com/How to find Nicole https://nicolefonarow.com/, How to find Jolene https://dibledough.com/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban vs. US Bell-to-Bell Phone Bans in Schools

    Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban vs. US Bell-to-Bell Phone Bans in Schools
    2026/04/01
    Two big stories have been sitting with us. Australia moving to ban social media for kids under 16, and U.S. schools rolling out “bell to bell” phone bans. Australia’s move is bold, and we don’t think anyone believes it will be perfect. Enforcement will be messy, there will be loopholes, and kids will try to get around it. But we still respect the statement it makes. It forces the conversation into the open and signals that constant, unsupervised access to algorithm-driven platforms is not a harmless childhood right. It is a risk, and adults need to stop pretending otherwise.Then there’s the U.S. “bell to bell” ban conversation, and it feels like another version of the same awakening. Not “put it on silent” or “keep it in your bag,” but actual phone-free school days. The point isn’t that adults hate technology. It’s that teachers are watching attention, learning, and social skills take a hit in real time. And when phones are removed from the classroom equation, something simple but powerful happens. Kids talk, play, make eye contact, and teachers report fewer distractions and more present students.In this episode, Jolene and I also talk about what these bans can and cannot do. A school ban can change the day, but kids still go home to devices. A social media ban can shift norms, but it won’t teach digital judgement on its own. That’s why we keep coming back to the bigger question: what does a healthier relationship with tech actually look like, and how do we build it on purpose? We would love to hear your take in the comments. Do you think Australia’s under-16 social media ban will help, or backfire? And should more U.S. schools go “bell to bell”?CHAPTER MARKERS:00:00 Intro02:02 Australia ban: covered platforms and expectation of glitches/workarounds03:38 Early workaround example and Meta removing underage accounts in Australia04:12 Online Safety Act timeline; no accounts under 16; can still browse without accounts05:22 Rationale: limiting algorithm-driven targeting and mental health harms07:10 Verification and enforcement: “reasonable steps,” accountability, and potential $30M fines10:16 Shift to US: 35 states + DC adopting bell-to-bell school phone bans12:02 Bipartisan dynamics, safety/shooting concerns, and workarounds15:25 Alternatives: flip phones, pagers/payphones; key stats on depression/sleep and public support17:52 Tech leaders restricting their own kids’ phone/social media use23:00 Broader reflection: problem-solving skills and attention in an always-online world26:20 Parenting boundaries: phones in rooms, supervised computer use, and saying no28:24 Nuance on school bans: concern about teaching responsible use vs. total prohibition30:13 Proposal: “digital citizenship” education alongside restrictions31:27 Discipline burden on teachers; varied state/school rules; request for educator feedback34:14 Surgeon General warning-label idea; debate over shame vs. action; multi-pronged solutions36:12 Safety concerns: predators and kids’ platforms like Roblox37:19 Social media design as addiction40:22 Modeling behavior: adults on phones and kids seeking attention42:04 Partisanship hypothetical: potential backlash if Trump pushed a phone-ban policy44:07 Closing takeaways: learn from Australia47:10 Would-you-rather questions; choosing YouTube as the one appRESOURCES MENTIONED:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-04/when-is-the-teen-social-media-ban-what-apps-are-banned/106086152https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-19/roblox-brings-in-age-checks-ahead-of-australian-ban/106025742https://ministers.education.gov.au/clare/school-behaviour-improving-after-mobile-phone-ban-and-vaping-reformsGood for the Soul: https://www.instagram.com/weatheradam/?hl=enLINKS:On Instagram https://www.instagram.com/wevegottotalk/ On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@WeveGotToTalkHow to find Nicole https://nicolefonarow.com/How to find Jolene https://dibledough.com/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    41 分
まだレビューはありません