Professional Supplements for Wise Athletes (click to see the huge "always on" discount)

Affordable (best pricing by far) Blood Testing at GoodLabs (use code WISE for 20% discount)

• Dr. Mike blends deep academic knowledge with practical, field-tested insights to burn fat, build strength, and recover more effectively.PhD in Exercise Physiology from University of Minnesota
• BA in Natural Science from St. Scholastica
• MS in Biomechanics from Michigan Technological University
• Adjunct Professor in Human Performance for Carrick Institute for Functional Neurology

• Mike T Nelson website
• Dr Mike's Newsletter signup link

There's a fight on the internet about VO₂max. One camp treats it as the single number that rules your healthspan — get it as high as humanly possible, no matter the cost. Another camp says it's overhyped, mismeasured, and not worth your attention at all. As usual, the loudest voices are the least useful.

So I brought the question to someone I actually trust: Dr. Mike T. Nelson, back on the show for his fourth conversation with me. Mike is the rare internet fitness voice with both the science and the scruples, and he's written about this exact controversy. My question for him was simple and a little selfish: I'm 64, I don't have unlimited time or unlimited recovery. How much should someone like me actually be chasing VO₂max — and once I've got "enough," where should my effort go instead?

His answer is what this episode is about, and it comes down to a sweet spot. Yes, VO₂max is one of the most powerful longevity predictors we've ever measured — climbing out of the bottom of the pack buys you more protection than almost anything else you can do. But the benefit curve flattens. There's a point where squeezing out another few percent costs enormous effort for very little return — effort that would do far more good aimed at whatever your real weak link is.

Along the way Mike takes apart some sacred cows. Why zone 2, for most of us, is not the magic everyone says it is. How to actually program intervals so you're building speed instead of just collecting misery. Why your fading max heart rate might be partly a use-it-or-lose-it problem. And how something as quiet as your breathing rate while you sleep can tell you whether you're sabotaging your own oxygen delivery.

If you've ever stared at the VO₂max number on your watch and wondered whether to celebrate it, panic about it, or ignore it — this one's for you.

1. VO2max predicts longevity — strongly, but with a caveat. The mortality benefit of moving from very unfit to fit appears larger than almost any other measured intervention, exceeding smoking cessation. But most of that effect comes from rescuing the bottom of the range, not pushing an already-good number higher. (Human observational data; reverse causality is a standing confounder.
2. The "VO2max is overblown" controversy is mostly noise. The complaint that studies use METs and submax estimates rather than gold-standard lab tests is technically correct — but the surrogates and the lab measures largely agree, so the distinction doesn't change the practical conclusion.
3. VO2max is limited by your weakest link — either oxygen delivery (heart, blood flow) or oxygen utilization(muscle, mitochondria). T...

Professional Supplements for Wise Athletes (click to see the huge "always on" discount)

Affordable (best pricing by far) Blood Testing at GoodLabs (use code WISE for 20% discount)

• Dr. José Areta is an Associate Professor in Exercise Metabolism and Nutrition at the School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University (UK). Originally from Argentina and trained first as a biologist (with a minor in zoology), he completed his PhD in exercise physiology and nutrition at RMIT University in Melbourne, then spent roughly three years as a postdoctoral researcher at the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences before moving to Liverpool. His research centers on training–nutrition interactions in humans — how manipulating carbohydrate, protein, fat, and overall energy availability shapes adaptation to training and physical performance. In recent years his work has focused on the endocrine, metabolic, and physiological effects of energy deficiency, including the first dynamic proteomic profiling of how human skeletal muscle responds to a short-term energy deficit combined with exercise. He is also a practicing athlete, coach, and practitioner, and has roughly 60 peer-reviewed publications.

• Jose Areta, PhD profile

• Most of us treat an energy deficit as a problem to be corrected — a state where you've fallen below a known requirement, risking lost muscle and blunted performance. Areta's reframe: think of it as energy stress. Like exercise stress, it's a signal the body is built to adapt to, and — at least as a working hypothesis — one you may get better at handling with repeated, progressive exposure. We (probably) evolved under intermittent scarcity, and a body that responded to hunger by becoming weak and slow wouldn't have survived to find its next meal. The practical hook for the older athlete: if you're always in a calorie surplus to recover and build, you're adding fat alongside muscle. Energy stress, used deliberately, becomes the tool for managing body (low) fatness without sacrificing the performance and muscle you've worked for.

1. You can get stronger in a deficit without getting bigger. Energy deficit plus resistance training yields the same strength gains as energy-balanced training — but without the same hypertrophy. The gains come from neuromuscular adaptation, not added mass. (Function over form.)
2. Protein is the lever that makes a deficit safe. Requirements rise to roughly 2.2 g/kg/day to preserve lean mass during a deficit. The threshold that matters: deficits beyond about 500 kcal/day impair muscle-building even with training; below that, recomposition (muscle gain + fat loss) stays achievable.
3. Fat is the fuel; contractile muscle is largely spared. In Areta's short-term deficit study, energy came predominantly from fat oxidation, and most of the apparent "lean loss" was water — the contractile machinery was preserved.
4. The deficit upregulates mitochondrial machinery. Deficit-plus-exercise increased mitochondrial protein synthesis and quality-control proteins — the stress acted as an adaptive signal, not just depletion. Meanwhile the collagen "scaffolding" proteins that rise with aging were reduced — though whether that's net-beneficial isn't yet settled.
5. The body has no fixed metabolic rate. It adjusts expenditure and efficiency to energy ava...

Professional Supplements for Wise Athletes (click to see the huge "always on" discount)

Affordable (best pricing by far) Blood Testing at GoodLabs (use code WISE for 20% discount)

• Author of "Fixing You" series
• Author of Pain Patterns
• www.rickolderman.com

This episode focuses on addressing chronic pain in older athletes using a comprehensive "systems thinking" approach to physical therapy. Rather than treating pain as an isolated symptom with a checklist of generic exercises, the discussion highlights the importance of diagnosing the underlying root causes through a simplified series of diagnostic tests. The conversation digs into how systemic bodily compensations hide underlying structural issues, how dysfunctional walking patterns directly trigger chronic lower body pain, and how most chronic back pain is mistreated by conventional physical therapy methods.

• Immediate Pain Feedback: Effective physical therapy should yield almost immediate feedback and pain relief during testing if the correct underlying trigger is successfully targeted and adjusted.
• The "Spaghetti Against the Wall" Approach: Conventional physical therapy often hands patients a long list of general exercises without meaningful, personalized testing to determine the specific cause of pain.
• The Deception of Painless Damage: Our bodies are masterful "compensation machines," meaning structural degradation (visible on MRIs) can silently accumulate completely under the radar long before rising to the level of actual pain.
• Walking as a Keystone: Chronic pain tracking from the lower back all the way down to the feet is heavily tied to dysfunctional walking patterns; fixing the gait is fundamental to resolving this pain.
• The Over-Striding Error: A highly common walking issue involves throwing the foot too far out in front of the body with a heavy heel strike, which locks the knee and shuts off the gluteus maximus.
• Activating the Glutes: To properly engage the glutes and control pelvic/hip mechanics, walkers must focus on moving their entire body forward with the advancing foot, ensuring the knee stays automatically softened.
• The Three Body Systems and Patterns: The human frame operates on three distinct systems (movement, fascial, and reflex neurological) that get trapped in three fundamental problematic patterns: extension (too arched), flexion (too flat), or side-bending (uneven pelvis).
• The Back Crease Photo Test: A simple diagnostic test for a side-bending problem is having a photo taken of your bare back; a larger crease at the waist on one side indicates an uneven pelvis and rib cage, which typically aligns with the side of sciatic or SI joint pain.
• The Prevalence of Extension Problems: Roughly 99% of patients with chronic back pain suffer from an extension problem (an over-arched back), which is easily identified if back pain worsens when laying flat with straight legs or standing.
• The Flaw in Standard Back Care: Most traditional physical therapy methods treat chronic back pain by prescribing back-arching and prone press-up exercises, which actually worsen pain for 99% of chronic patients because it reinforces their existing extension problem.